Hate Watching with Dan and Tony

Hate Watching In Time: I'd Pay Several Years to Get This Time Back

Dan Goodsell and Tony Czech Season 1 Episode 296

Use Left/Right to seek, Home/End to jump to start or end. Hold shift to jump forward or backward.

0:00 | 1:50:49

Send us Fan Mail

A world where you can literally spend your life on a cup of coffee should be terrifying. Instead, In Time (2011) somehow turns one of the best sci-fi dystopia premises of the last two decades into a story that keeps dodging its own consequences, and we could not let that slide.

We walk through Andrew Niccol’s time-currency concept scene by scene, from the moment Justin Timberlake’s character gets a life-changing windfall to the way the movie handles time transfer, surveillance, and the so-called Timekeepers. Along the way we get into the stuff that matters to anyone who loves film craft: why voiceover often signals a script problem, how music choices can kill tension, and why a police-state setting can’t have “we don’t have the last five minutes of footage” energy. We also give credit where it’s due, because Roger Deakins’ cinematography makes several moments look genuinely stunning even when the logic is melting down.

Then we hit the big pivot: when “time is money” stops being a story engine and the movie becomes a Bonnie and Clyde style bank robbery spree. We talk class zones, tolls, the weird math of the “million years” plan, and the action beats that look unintentionally hilarious. If you’ve ever argued about plot holes, world rules, or why great premises deserve better scripts, you’ll have plenty to yell about with us.

Subscribe for more hate-watching, share this with a friend who loves sci-fi movies, and leave a review with your favorite “wait, how does that work?” moment from In Time.


Written Lovingly by AI

Be our friend!

Dan: @shakybacon
Tony: @tonydczech

And follow the podcast on IG: @hatewatchingDAT